This resource does more harm than it does good in my opinion. It relies on the assumption that all fly exploits enable PlatformStanding, and also on the unrealistic assumption that the developer or some native engine feature or Roblox gear does not enable PlatformStanding. His anti speed exploit check will only work under the assumption that the exploiter is both using the native humanoid state handler for movement and the assumption that the exploiter isn’t spoofing the speed that is being provided to the Running state.Īnd the next one is his “anti fly exploit” which, to put it simply, won’t even work in a realistic scenario. Just by looking at the code of this “new and improved” version I can already see that it is equally as bad, if not even worse than his previous version, the only part of his code I can see that actually looks like it functions well and without much flaws is the check for noclip. Links to the source and the installer plugin are at the top of the topic! Having an Anti-Cheat does not mean you do not have to secure your game. Remember: Any anti-cheat can be bypassed. Here are some of the kick messages you can receive: (slightly reworded as of V1.1) You should also see an “ORANGECAT” script in ServerScriptService which contains the main code. Those are in the a folder named “oranegcatac” in ServerStorage. If the plugin updates, this should appear:Īfter that, there will be 4 new instances. This is from the plugin requesting the latest version from GithubĪfter you press allow, this should appear: (currently appears when playtesting because plugins don’t respect RunService:IsRunMode()) You should see this when you first install or open a project without ORANGECAT Anti-Cheat: I added that so the plugin doesn’t do a failed install the first time. When you first load the plugin, it should ask for script-injection permissions. ORANGECAT uses a plugin to auto-update so you get the latest version and don’t use the old versions (I am new to making Anti-Cheat so I improve this a lot) Those were replaced with solid checks in the rewrite (V1.1) Note: Until comment 25 on this thread, everyone is expressing valid criticism of V1 because it had some not that great checks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |